{"id":"W4247611913","doi":"10.2458/azu_jrm_v54i2_bai","title":"Relationship between plant species diversity and grassland condition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Range Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Grassland; Forb; Species richness; Grazing; Biomass (ecology); Species evenness; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Ecology; Productivity; Species diversity; Diversity index; Litter; Ecosystem; Vegetation (pathology); Agronomy; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002441076,0.00004156213,0.00007654353,0.00003602798,0.0003579212,0.000007191385,0.00005777089,0.00001834157,0.0001327385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001208633,0.00003481631,0.00002214949,0.00005718712,0.00007085884,0.0001301787,0.0002239997,0.00006311284,0.00002053585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004897624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":4.677858e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003853187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006632101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996089,0.00002624483,0.0001181221,0.00005319642,0.0001275269,0.00006604582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997467,0.0000752265,0.0001107206,0.00003331963,0.000005315037,0.00002869514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001253617,0.00001298121,0.9968931,0.000005309084,0.00002697216,0.00004054219,0.0003087258,0.00008202511,8.19961e-7,0.0006998439,0.001720364,0.0001967999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003761115,0.00004461303,0.992426,0.000005688037,0.00006234606,0.00001411249,0.0002506976,0.00002322655,5.910074e-7,0.003980983,0.002777491,0.00003809285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850872,0.00004665412,0.001387317,0.0005766021,0.00006672832,0.00005389161,0.0000026687,0.000003550085,0.01277536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980607,0.0001982086,0.0002494799,0.0000509225,0.00002980999,5.384018e-7,0.000001851709,0.000001427985,0.001407046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01297348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0333150833264506,"score_gpt":0.2344781875978069,"score_spread":0.2011631042713563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}