{"id":"W4247669034","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100004230","title":"Possessor Raising in Nuu-chah-nulth","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Linguistics; Clitic; Subject (documents); Raising (metalworking); Noun phrase; Genitive case; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Noun","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001228477,0.0002643767,0.0004263812,0.0008968667,0.002374951,0.001368255,0.0006008857,0.0006786094,0.005725217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00196386,0.0003997521,0.0003688392,0.001141535,0.00246425,0.002435689,0.002817055,0.001173256,0.0007056188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001578848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009652803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004803847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006882715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994285,0.0001532109,0.00004120775,0.000107892,0.0001408091,0.0001283951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985945,0.0005630879,0.0001975518,0.000306733,0.0002454971,0.00009262848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006776461,0.0002651314,0.0293345,0.0003606032,0.00007072149,0.008074665,0.0462703,0.001258658,0.0576583,0.7952372,0.005867296,0.05492486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000252941,0.0007417415,0.1353659,0.0003663697,0.0002527209,0.01392175,0.02651986,0.02180366,0.07991652,0.4380589,0.2823926,0.0004070904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8761151,0.0003116693,0.01684659,0.0006365626,0.000118465,0.0001160619,0.0003578729,0.0004281485,0.1050695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942368,0.00003923088,0.001865973,0.00008084027,0.00002738934,0.00001655507,0.0001521529,0.00007106959,0.003510091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005725217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0191527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02599390100878419,"score_gpt":0.2527825325862837,"score_spread":0.2267886315774996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}