{"id":"W4247698826","doi":"10.1142/s021974990500133x","title":"MIXED-STATE ENTANGLEMENT IN THE LIGHT OF PURE-STATE ENTANGLEMENT CONSTRAINED BY SUPERSELECTION RULES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quantum Information","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Superselection; Quantum entanglement; Squashed entanglement; Multipartite entanglement; Entanglement witness; W state; State (computer science); Quantum mechanics; Physics; Theoretical physics; Quantum state; Analogy; Quantum; Mathematics; Algorithm; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00119273,0.0001425591,0.0001669832,0.0006916867,0.00005628994,0.000248238,0.001028064,0.00003689034,0.00005214396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004806308,0.0001060171,0.0001510639,0.0003319797,0.00004294654,0.004403476,0.00005825753,0.0001990214,0.00003407512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001645685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001000589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001442821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001695363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970225,0.00009135284,0.001450653,0.00007025388,0.001174914,0.0001902923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980128,0.00006129126,0.0010727,0.0001514848,0.0006444597,0.00005724448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003871116,0.0008732616,0.00210692,0.00006747369,0.0004263807,0.00001748861,0.06305107,0.006126441,0.003752335,0.5140851,0.04049083,0.3686156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009370289,0.001531618,0.008112205,0.0003960057,0.00004808501,0.0009138155,0.01257728,0.3320594,0.07107604,0.02182885,0.5412167,0.0008697353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5240223,0.000138819,0.4582753,0.01250716,0.001441755,0.000349821,0.00007608032,0.00003419004,0.00315448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964508,0.0001657941,0.002058223,0.001208331,0.00005671697,0.000008419086,0.00004185512,0.000003261139,0.000006593572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5007259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4323254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009917322643940185,"score_gpt":0.2389176388043059,"score_spread":0.2290003161603658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}