{"id":"W4247771189","doi":"10.3897/aca.4.e63836","title":"An assay validation framework to compare and evaluate targeted environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Workflow; Sampling (signal processing); Scale (ratio); Computer science; Data mining; Computational biology; Biology; Risk analysis (engineering); Biodiversity; Ecology; Medicine; Cartography; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003937437,0.0002647018,0.000248579,0.00002969322,0.0004040414,0.0001366702,0.0002453863,0.00007790052,0.001426492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001619143,0.0002859531,0.00005231445,0.00009632255,0.000213371,0.0004751107,0.0003457879,0.0001641327,0.0004436459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002513371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007528129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005678256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002366012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980708,0.00009397617,0.0002791609,0.0006585174,0.0004811254,0.0004164314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990661,0.0001942323,0.0001185557,0.0003503348,0.00001284689,0.0002579377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000308948,0.000201628,0.7251339,0.00001019089,0.00003772002,0.00001604685,0.001652627,0.00193715,0.2667157,0.00005786266,0.0003462347,0.003860021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002814613,0.00008594091,0.8129777,0.00002873105,0.00003926417,0.000004251382,0.001981121,0.0001284009,0.182594,0.0003961942,0.001196972,0.0002859794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960001,0.00005256038,0.00137084,0.0004650327,0.000228797,0.0004093475,0.000147336,0.00004966553,0.001276368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731594,0.00009212353,0.02599646,0.0001632,0.00008143813,0.00003458278,0.0001314473,0.00001739217,0.0003239271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08784378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04268587339635432,"score_gpt":0.275264902589869,"score_spread":0.2325790291935147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}