{"id":"W4247845444","doi":"10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02080.x","title":"Structure and composition of edges next to regenerating clear‐cuts in mixed‐wood boreal forest","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Taiga; Secondary forest; Old-growth forest; Understory; Shrub; Ecology; Coarse woody debris; Boreal; Canopy; Regeneration (biology); Biology; Forestry; Geography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002122738,0.0002272756,0.0002623583,0.0005775578,0.0004964834,0.0005480071,0.0002912848,0.0002031992,0.0005114592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002691497,0.0001465692,0.0001704183,0.000304837,0.0003386989,0.0001796944,0.0003179771,0.000191153,0.00007638028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008836549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004547221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09688837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3532234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998385,0.00001565473,0.000006452865,0.00004580493,0.00004126033,0.00005237207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999496,0.00004832526,0.0001519293,0.0000155069,0.0001242665,0.0001640013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004608183,0.00007668162,0.9447991,0.00005267191,0.00007334141,0.0001804661,0.0006723211,0.0002630056,0.04771625,0.00003997991,0.000100643,0.005564716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.716433e-7,0.00001190944,0.9997144,8.152203e-7,0.000002496171,0.00001089199,0.00008898785,0.00003091747,0.00009627535,0.000002553434,0.00003935342,8.685791e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996719,0.00005955472,0.00003979079,0.000002291471,8.325998e-7,0.000002380717,0.00006073165,0.000002318024,0.0001601122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993269,0.00003151492,0.0001682997,0.000009236758,0.000001517432,0.0000032779,0.0002169204,0.000001812562,0.000240348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09688837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1926488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01730865749537403,"score_gpt":0.2518561037191895,"score_spread":0.2345474462238155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}