{"id":"W4248102306","doi":"10.31223/osf.io/zxyku","title":"HESS Opinions: Improving the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental to global scale models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Commensurability (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Groundwater; Earth system science; Expert elicitation; Computer science; Groundwater model; Representation (politics); Environmental resource management; Earth science; Environmental science; Groundwater flow; Aquifer; Geography; Geology; Cartography; Meteorology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02751432,0.001492674,0.001101453,0.001697748,0.0007974162,0.004285918,0.003327254,0.002472911,0.02019013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09751499,0.0004367391,0.001343941,0.002251393,0.0009096759,0.004530291,0.003599554,0.001671338,0.003129392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002645475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00274102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01812482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01816596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852986,0.008891799,0.0007903124,0.0007883233,0.003925699,0.0003051161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9504238,0.02660384,0.001763097,0.006154967,0.01367552,0.001378685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007384158,0.0002192916,0.01357014,0.0009965091,0.0005376901,0.0003484817,0.0007086327,0.5488181,0.004215039,0.04655983,0.2052688,0.1780191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004639914,0.0003240733,0.00532941,0.0006041609,0.0001219795,0.00005451294,0.0009441903,0.8626842,0.008847918,0.04474812,0.07566579,0.0002115765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1775529,0.001829782,0.5222187,0.03192195,0.00263056,0.001674746,0.04879381,0.01988391,0.1934938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7233612,0.001231728,0.2302179,0.001822685,0.0003683371,0.001025151,0.02709615,0.003604386,0.01127245],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02751432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1455114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04922226799158695,"score_gpt":0.3142277357616171,"score_spread":0.2650054677700301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}