{"id":"W4248150365","doi":"10.1109/iros.2016.7759623","title":"An anticipative kinematic limitation avoidance algorithm for collaborative robots: Two-dimensional case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Robot; Computer science; Task (project management); Obstacle avoidance; Obstacle; Robot kinematics; Position (finance); Collision avoidance; Principal (computer security); Artificial intelligence; Simulation; Control theory (sociology); Control engineering; Algorithm; Engineering; Mobile robot; Control (management); Collision","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000477364,0.0004464911,0.0004163625,0.0003267035,0.0004435302,0.0004296598,0.0009172212,0.000830451,0.00113345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001028991,0.000226621,0.0003169719,0.0002424205,0.0005066451,0.0005414581,0.000871575,0.0005335758,0.0002060491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003127622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005431116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001488163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001038189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997744,0.00004086056,0.00001823379,0.0000525846,0.0000792983,0.00003468525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996835,0.0001424854,0.00006079552,0.00004188617,0.00004866945,0.00002275857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001826305,0.00009835428,0.001121373,0.0001204817,0.00003368338,0.0004473848,0.0003822182,0.7174197,0.02321314,0.02154873,0.0008641877,0.234568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002375615,0.0001101501,0.0001912316,0.000008244272,0.000009348267,0.0001570804,0.00002769676,0.9915075,0.003825221,0.002713993,0.001410681,0.0000150949],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01411754,0.00004452142,0.9846625,0.00003699054,0.000006954148,0.00002708005,0.00000478357,0.0001674045,0.0009322173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4924988,0.0001002161,0.505151,0.00004143457,0.00001314298,0.0001443047,0.00002665255,0.00002799289,0.001996506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001488163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003791749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03592314913863721,"score_gpt":0.31716236608721,"score_spread":0.2812392169485728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}