{"id":"W4248318771","doi":"10.1139/l99-090","title":"A simplified method for seismic analysis of lattice telecommunication towers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Vibration and Dynamic Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Structural engineering; Superposition principle; Acceleration; Vibration; Modal analysis; Response spectrum; Tower; Normal mode; Seismic analysis; Lattice (music); Engineering; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Acoustics; Finite element method; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000295659,0.0001009174,0.0003276984,0.0008035603,0.00003240221,0.00002331032,0.0002000872,0.00006098337,0.000621981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005803279,0.0001107858,0.0002559537,0.0007520824,0.00000980423,0.0001295898,0.000001896833,0.000125003,0.000001553067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001160265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001007317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003790895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02210726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992474,0.00001482923,0.0004163383,0.00005833698,0.00008176208,0.0001813229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992985,0.0001118411,0.00007064556,0.0001866056,0.0001003912,0.0002320552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002584385,0.000002070922,0.00006729562,0.0000216301,0.0008271988,0.000001562419,0.0002601048,0.9916142,0.000169365,0.00008349596,0.000249629,0.006700873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001617587,0.00001536101,0.0006337903,0.00001916553,0.0006905447,0.000006554427,0.00005174447,0.9862962,0.00009991296,0.00003536803,0.01188714,0.0001024055],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01063268,0.0004955359,0.9869297,0.00009695483,0.0000744965,0.00005235295,0.00002609071,0.0000201515,0.001672033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859838,0.00006769546,0.01375339,0.00004322869,0.00003179305,0.000002645023,0.00001436331,0.0000208398,0.0000822475],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008190949180539022,"score_gpt":0.2240856966881944,"score_spread":0.2158947475076554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}