{"id":"W4248339509","doi":"10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02252.x","title":"Holocene land uplift and its influence on fire history and ecosystem development in boreal Sweden","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vegetation (pathology); Boreal; Holocene; Fire regime; Taiga; Humus; Physical geography; Ecosystem; Geology; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Sea level; Fire ecology; Post-glacial rebound; Environmental science; Geography; Oceanography; Forestry; Geomorphology; Paleontology; Soil science; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001471199,0.00009555223,0.0001534487,0.0001427023,0.00009133196,0.00003969147,0.0002059073,0.00003477518,0.000006366418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002233102,0.00007791018,0.0000121766,0.0002609453,0.0001274307,0.0008767914,0.00006080391,0.0001255226,0.00002977158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001101687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001642078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006491066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001464215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985994,0.00003696592,0.0003623901,0.0002111695,0.0006079739,0.0001820787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.00006821805,0.0002884636,0.00007706314,0.00003967014,0.0001517933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487915,0.0003529089,0.8162915,0.0002904969,0.0000170373,0.0003257233,0.01704448,0.05791128,0.05674476,0.0004106076,0.000104187,0.05035823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006161235,0.0001721477,0.9922163,0.0002497028,0.000002606617,0.0001506404,0.00002719214,0.002443482,0.003599741,0.00004122056,0.0003759146,0.0001049496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986531,0.0003859109,0.00002940064,0.0001410336,0.0001602808,0.0001252994,2.922714e-7,0.000005386113,0.0004992858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991828,0.00003159717,0.0006342054,0.0001150944,0.00001480162,0.000002864297,9.446328e-8,0.000004526766,0.00001407473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1759248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3177085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01092767779802833,"score_gpt":0.2303113222562147,"score_spread":0.2193836444581864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}