{"id":"W4248480500","doi":"10.1504/ijgw.2017.087197","title":"Environmental impact assessment of renewables and conventional fuels for different end use purposes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Global Warming","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Renewable energy; Hydropower; Environmental impact assessment; Coal; Electricity; Fossil fuel; Electricity generation; Biomass (ecology); Life-cycle assessment; Natural gas; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Environmental protection; Production (economics); Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001025157,0.0005526696,0.0003057002,0.0031703,0.0003118163,0.0009252518,0.0002612526,0.0003024787,0.002801319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001046813,0.00007420406,0.000633884,0.002538481,0.0002278292,0.0007297057,0.0007934454,0.000190741,0.0003069153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007394937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000372143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002453422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009185952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985654,0.0002198062,0.00005619845,0.00006781813,0.0009771835,0.0001136245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990428,0.000294232,0.0001349977,0.00006101913,0.0004205072,0.0000463779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001549042,0.0008895316,0.3992235,0.001970262,0.001191035,0.001602001,0.0003996547,0.1471228,0.05827395,0.01070032,0.003259648,0.3738182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003158125,0.001673068,0.8345906,0.0003471767,0.0004390366,0.0007705134,0.003367468,0.0530452,0.05562286,0.00847807,0.04152104,0.0001133428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.939941,0.002179526,0.006094649,0.0001376832,0.00004787969,0.0001092866,0.002419716,0.00004657911,0.04902377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938763,0.0006696937,0.002399884,0.00002402617,0.00001322918,0.00003472653,0.0009711906,0.00001465562,0.001996244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0093714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02073357771224996,"score_gpt":0.3255834371262583,"score_spread":0.3048498594140083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}