{"id":"W4248581481","doi":"10.3138/jcs.39.2.179","title":"Contexts in Conflict: Public and Private Components of Assessment in Ethical Judgements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public opinion; Observer (physics); Boundary (topology); Epistemology; Political science; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law; Economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001343165,0.0000593289,0.000271968,0.0005447315,0.00007887214,0.0000146134,0.00013904,0.0001172884,0.00001412636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004587771,0.00005350416,0.00002492011,0.0002369037,0.0003625104,0.0001327861,0.00002480746,0.0004900104,7.083131e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004079542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004822283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05046141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6371489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987673,0.0001689205,0.0004381234,0.00005575101,0.0002934505,0.0002765242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992027,0.0001814916,0.0001849471,0.00003563304,0.0001582177,0.0002370715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001248457,0.0000561987,0.7145042,0.00003271843,0.0001488139,0.0000498057,0.03634279,0.0000119053,0.00006130581,0.2288309,0.01355508,0.006393748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009972176,0.00004825445,0.398576,0.0001401166,0.00001216547,0.000003589294,0.008779266,0.00001068297,0.000007687997,0.001824266,0.5895166,0.00008421572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9399839,0.002837148,0.000001629843,0.0479884,0.0002250983,0.00009331767,0.000006613778,0.000001231141,0.008862677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945479,0.003663899,0.0001924452,0.001327668,0.0001513811,0.000001017026,2.170168e-7,0.000002855862,0.0001126231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5866874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9558616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1058469233036654,"score_gpt":0.3938131959550172,"score_spread":0.2879662726513518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}