{"id":"W4248581481","doi":"10.3138/jcs.39.2.179","title":"Contexts in Conflict: Public and Private Components of Assessment in Ethical Judgements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public opinion; Observer (physics); Boundary (topology); Epistemology; Political science; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law; Economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03024191,0.0005204582,0.0008473283,0.00382025,0.01512747,0.01782737,0.001534195,0.002018022,0.002392732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1207659,0.001065798,0.0004677653,0.003348671,0.04016927,0.009554082,0.01748072,0.004633644,0.0001323826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02220399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01609836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1213754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1792526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9081903,0.06997281,0.002111518,0.002693342,0.01229785,0.004734295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8709463,0.09525671,0.013207,0.005873949,0.009442686,0.005273402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003737697,0.0001733861,0.1169278,0.0002492761,0.00007270887,0.0004655474,0.7445045,0.0007057873,0.001002427,0.09518402,0.001007592,0.03933317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005663117,0.0001234786,0.2160653,0.0005675685,0.00009272851,0.0003938118,0.6822821,0.001513187,0.000866733,0.0835808,0.01428152,0.0001761627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163989,0.001486909,0.005678744,0.006180137,0.00007582677,0.0001042483,0.00006355013,0.00001722468,0.06999459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993025,0.00008280005,0.0003645284,0.00007911059,0.000007876411,0.00002039443,0.000005603352,0.000004403136,0.0001328663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1213754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2413378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1058469233036654,"score_gpt":0.3938131959550172,"score_spread":0.2879662726513518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}