{"id":"W4248837261","doi":"10.1177/16094069211045473","title":"If Adorno Met Intersectionality Theory: Reconceiving the Method of Negative Case Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts; Dalhousie University; Canadian Nurses Foundation","keywords":"Intersectionality; Equity (law); Epistemology; Grounded theory; Sociology; Power (physics); Relation (database); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Gender equity; Explanatory power; Political science; Social science; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Computer science; Law; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05060259,0.0001237352,0.000476204,0.0002998713,0.0003035381,0.00008887329,0.0006046686,0.00007987164,0.001399038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01664175,0.00009467233,0.0007228579,0.001020118,0.000543801,0.0004650385,0.0001419811,0.0003869687,0.000002179102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002637971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000447983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001878731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006035886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9573275,0.04060288,0.0008152133,0.0001990414,0.000888216,0.0001671538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773008,0.01702196,0.001278997,0.0001656512,0.00412468,0.0001078624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002458585,0.0001727384,0.001697978,0.000009723367,0.007410287,0.0002529158,0.7228188,0.0004201326,0.0005378347,0.2279773,0.000233712,0.03822269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003799278,0.00006455774,0.001876976,0.00003006638,0.0006931879,0.000160227,0.7242405,0.00007771945,0.004765311,0.2645107,0.003079163,0.0001217067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06693015,0.0001567471,0.9213074,0.003938552,0.001199789,0.00006662339,0.00009083721,0.000007112382,0.006302739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6399162,0.00004533467,0.3590439,0.0003224381,0.0002509787,0.000001612624,0.000003084955,0.000004387315,0.0004121402],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.572986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5843515146589131,"score_gpt":0.6123139752625847,"score_spread":0.02796246060367158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}