{"id":"W4248859719","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-07890","title":"Reflective item types in a high stakes assessment of English for academic purposes: an examination of the method effect","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Library science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1287568,0.001133053,0.001234381,0.003138351,0.001410571,0.004452186,0.00340805,0.002107189,0.005067573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.416581,0.001340662,0.002405323,0.001803725,0.002381574,0.004710332,0.0049293,0.003326692,0.001986879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002366716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001916412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001722871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00336651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8268984,0.1159938,0.01218671,0.01028787,0.03314471,0.00148862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2572267,0.6702729,0.02933912,0.02415469,0.01605022,0.002956404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02018748,0.00516072,0.6681635,0.001248498,0.003825808,0.0003043784,0.02200408,0.001388912,0.01076729,0.002875372,0.002720014,0.2613539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001719059,0.007970064,0.9626127,0.0006505277,0.001212227,0.0006995432,0.005279622,0.005179729,0.007567311,0.003010176,0.003853835,0.0002451576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710103,0.0009558292,0.01363904,0.0003844837,0.0003242799,0.001681479,0.000246324,0.0001626595,0.01159566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687363,0.0004009674,0.02096264,0.0004224006,0.00008531058,0.003208627,0.0003583686,0.0002616645,0.005563724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1287568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02706124999370419,"score_gpt":0.3567702811617035,"score_spread":0.3297090311679993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}