{"id":"W4248916088","doi":"10.1139/f99-197","title":"Relationship of wooded riparian zones and runoff potential to fish community composition in agricultural streams","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Riparian zone; STREAMS; Species richness; Surface runoff; Environmental science; Index of biological integrity; Ecology; Benthic zone; Riparian forest; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Water quality; Habitat; Geography; Biology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002813487,0.0001168791,0.0001606135,0.0006347504,0.0002733193,0.0004077142,0.0001396269,0.0001691428,0.0008037508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001060689,0.0001467154,0.0001323,0.0004332349,0.0003491922,0.0002262421,0.0003347729,0.0001341637,0.00009185565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004256676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002412896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01112037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04140723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998117,0.00004196536,0.00001731318,0.00004695506,0.00003819058,0.00004399739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993681,0.0001292827,0.0002405021,0.00001678219,0.0000702347,0.0001749879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001197906,0.00002382529,0.9960064,0.000007247955,0.00003027612,0.00005445929,0.000129562,0.000170537,0.001513839,0.00001188417,0.00002439003,0.001907797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001329013,0.00002603045,0.9996686,9.243631e-7,0.000003030361,0.00002135124,0.00006200166,0.0001460514,0.00003978485,0.000009141068,0.00002097754,9.290338e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998623,0.00002452933,0.00001720198,0.000002509909,2.483564e-7,0.000001076698,0.00003390439,7.232633e-7,0.00005746195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997773,0.00002635935,0.00003840119,0.00000334363,0.000001238066,0.000002202021,0.00008717027,6.481181e-7,0.00006337599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01112037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0221113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01417040202368548,"score_gpt":0.2014452519074607,"score_spread":0.1872748498837752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}