{"id":"W4249461438","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14657517","title":"A matter of choice : a critical discourse analysis of ECEC policy in Canada's 2006 federal election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical discourse analysis; Dominance (genetics); Discourse analysis; Nominalization; Politics; Newspaper; Hegemony; Federal election; Sociology; Political science; Representation (politics); Public administration; Media studies; Linguistics; Ideology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01601233,0.0008320791,0.0008163603,0.01045552,0.0419287,0.02131627,0.002159688,0.00271111,0.002035711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03082338,0.0004532075,0.0003988738,0.0133774,0.03096802,0.004990638,0.004025981,0.004234337,0.0001298033],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2543439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1971692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9658834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886698,0.004431211,0.000357068,0.0009062662,0.003457471,0.00217818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670063,0.0217107,0.001533757,0.0005161139,0.007727105,0.001506163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006432697,0.00002697609,0.0035774,0.0001114153,0.000007899434,0.0003198972,0.9378705,0.0002236167,0.0003864423,0.04396513,0.0030236,0.01042296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009880208,0.00001057265,0.007969755,0.0002931727,0.00001438906,0.00004878152,0.9128351,0.0005300299,0.0007077463,0.003325418,0.07421365,0.00004153016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8830093,0.00360285,0.003598387,0.02571243,0.0003543967,0.0004306118,0.0006863782,0.00005187879,0.08255372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908128,0.0007924713,0.001407965,0.0006609135,0.00004136653,0.0001024553,0.000145488,0.00003222169,0.006004381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2543439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8648553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01346920635012,"score_gpt":0.3446681472304638,"score_spread":0.3311989408803438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}