{"id":"W4250022371","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.3.307","title":"The Ontology of the Scholarly Journal and the Place of Peer Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington State University; American Council of Learned Societies","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Argument (complex analysis); Scholarly communication; Ontology; Peer review; World Wide Web; Sociology; Protocol (science); Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Publishing; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08235896,0.0004136803,0.001068011,0.005471002,0.01232465,0.03958733,0.00416935,0.01484804,0.004166036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1152872,0.0007563417,0.001134485,0.008513101,0.1360399,0.03672469,0.009326908,0.02304019,0.0009513497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02083527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02950919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01870564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01761753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8847111,0.06272862,0.006035237,0.007874435,0.03407022,0.004580345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7955009,0.1336199,0.01226853,0.01771107,0.03213089,0.008768843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539128,0.00001007513,0.0001645381,0.00004747811,0.000005117147,0.00003662891,0.005722133,0.00007888511,0.00005547504,0.9849843,0.004685779,0.004194243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002902506,0.00002759756,0.00116618,0.000333636,0.00001516512,0.0001544171,0.00929941,0.0002861283,0.0002158401,0.7753531,0.213045,0.00007438222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01700296,0.02064514,0.02561368,0.7254522,0.006253317,0.00004692303,0.00009097481,0.0000708016,0.2048241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785354,0.01417521,0.01648516,0.05774625,0.008108128,0.0001610058,0.0000659438,0.0003487914,0.02437404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4355611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5900117260462768,"score_gpt":0.5086279091273846,"score_spread":0.08138381691889218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}