{"id":"W4250144784","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1011","title":"METHODOLOGY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE THEORY OF LAWYERS’ ETHICS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS WOOLLEY AND MARKOVITS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Identity (music); Sociology; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0926168,0.001054104,0.002460598,0.003333726,0.01516906,0.01972186,0.00666853,0.0252703,0.002997039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1023833,0.001184901,0.001587532,0.003852155,0.09362008,0.0246778,0.01157896,0.04842938,0.0006764212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03108628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01924008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02148181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02205235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8665458,0.1105953,0.002673017,0.006065885,0.01202294,0.002097036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7172855,0.2543873,0.004909175,0.004070109,0.01304884,0.006299203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003033245,0.00005578634,0.0002740595,0.0001882902,0.00001287464,0.0001835822,0.02589758,0.0003451772,0.00006958459,0.8399463,0.1264131,0.006583433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005828546,0.00004340976,0.0003894584,0.0008094693,0.000008247021,0.0001661976,0.0199738,0.001059071,0.0001193173,0.5625018,0.4148051,0.00006575207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007299175,0.007103871,0.001462062,0.9872033,0.001895052,0.000007413745,0.000006749313,0.000006700508,0.001584937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1235816,0.02158419,0.01014828,0.8069815,0.02607296,0.0004214347,0.00003417401,0.0001339721,0.01104198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4898103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.10050969560981,"score_gpt":0.4121986216690802,"score_spread":0.3116889260592702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}