{"id":"W4250210009","doi":"10.1115/1.1897405","title":"Analysis of Decomposability and Complexity for Design Problems in the Context of Decomposition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanical Design","topic":"Product Development and Customization","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Decomposition; A priori and a posteriori; Context (archaeology); Reduction (mathematics); Decomposition method (queueing theory); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003461594,0.0000855608,0.0003745201,0.0003040821,0.00004672586,0.00003489884,0.0001932244,0.00004716487,0.00001158711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002901661,0.00005872501,0.0001168354,0.0006526015,0.0000458678,0.0003619072,0.00002355557,0.00008043963,3.48619e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003334253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004019062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003299943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003615441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988202,0.00007702588,0.00066288,0.0001071633,0.000230206,0.0001024795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986399,0.0002585622,0.0006642753,0.00009545766,0.000332965,0.000008832352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009779833,0.007088621,0.04063593,0.002265827,0.004156098,0.00002094423,0.004553647,0.25373,0.1713536,0.4499478,0.001692943,0.05477478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01057673,0.0008568047,0.09852735,0.0004853942,0.003669498,0.00002127291,0.001478145,0.1571373,0.02958045,0.6967922,0.0002935962,0.0005812457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2099229,0.00006559499,0.7886043,0.0008668095,0.00005938959,0.0004584718,0.000001239225,0.00000376248,0.00001748052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744325,0.00001267267,0.02529078,0.0001937024,0.00005397844,0.000006070372,0.000004856893,0.000004850483,6.214528e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7645096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2394737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07412110325358008,"score_gpt":0.2796843783226616,"score_spread":0.2055632750690815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}