{"id":"W4251212784","doi":"10.4095/226043","title":"Residual total magnetic field, Partridge Breast Lake aeromagnetic survey, Hood Lake, NTS 64 H/3, Manitoba","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Residual; Aeromagnetic survey; Geodesy; Physical geography; Geochemistry; Geography; Magnetic field; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000626036,0.0006498939,0.0003227536,0.002751922,0.001755831,0.0005583235,0.001654169,0.000292848,0.01419938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00118084,0.0005446217,0.0002104552,0.003556372,0.0002764975,0.0004868583,0.0006086337,0.0004842969,0.006426169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00399462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01157319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996476,0.00003560323,0.00002122051,0.0000684719,0.0001624867,0.00006458544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982917,0.00007942506,0.0001099936,0.0001063752,0.001223519,0.0001890717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005447784,0.0004012491,0.6326346,0.0003196388,0.0001368207,0.0005246897,0.001768828,0.00201547,0.006972414,0.001013424,0.2606006,0.09306746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009742768,0.00009195677,0.9263489,0.00006365834,0.00005815975,0.00008585368,0.001163516,0.0008976764,0.002403844,0.0001097468,0.06865963,0.00001971797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3252431,0.0006394021,0.002454132,0.0008473272,0.0001430458,0.0009050253,0.5753946,0.0008814423,0.09349203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3593433,0.001104886,0.01080737,0.0003396243,0.00008168827,0.0008533181,0.3444638,0.0004144032,0.2825916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06451243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1297846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03475475014132533,"score_gpt":0.2498772525717361,"score_spread":0.2151225024304108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}