{"id":"W4251313412","doi":"10.1504/pcfd.2018.094621","title":"A numerical study of Rayleigh-Taylor instability for various Atwood numbers using ISPH method","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics An International Journal","topic":"Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Instability; Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics; Mechanics; Surface tension; Rayleigh–Taylor instability; Physics; Momentum (technical analysis); Bounded function; Viscosity; Classical mechanics; Rayleigh scattering; Statistical physics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005595238,0.0002209871,0.0002943567,0.0004838228,0.0001727197,0.0001844507,0.0004813155,0.00008729886,0.00006149317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008139505,0.0002368975,0.0001285135,0.0003191458,0.00009310568,0.0006311397,0.00005979668,0.0003040109,0.000002275838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007435961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001042829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006932722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001826801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978352,0.0001149462,0.0009317359,0.0002886574,0.0005668523,0.000262668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978734,0.0002985658,0.0001866954,0.0001749933,0.001351072,0.0001152595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483577,0.0009774009,0.06206,0.00001252582,0.0002494269,0.000006856269,0.0008116634,0.9205514,0.00002934499,0.006606097,0.000007909071,0.008538982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001551608,0.0004215026,0.02472388,0.00003244974,0.00002775986,0.00009750755,0.0002891808,0.9665471,0.00001154608,0.00606058,0.00002402186,0.0002128742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4980547,0.00001880456,0.5003554,0.00003738921,0.001126203,0.0002439173,0.00006199844,0.00003363462,0.00006798302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8337082,0.000002320656,0.1658072,0.00001834351,0.0003134155,0.000030589,0.00007726747,0.00004003123,0.00000265884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3356535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9660398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02296197244989816,"score_gpt":0.3611255333643019,"score_spread":0.3381635609144037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}