{"id":"W4251649490","doi":"10.1017/s0094837300018108","title":"Reconstruction of Tertiary <i>Metasequoia</i> forests. I. Test of a method for biomass determination based on stem dimensions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paleobiology","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Chamaecyparis; Canopy; Environmental science; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Forestry; Geography; Geology; Biology; Paleontology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002428477,0.0002134674,0.000156732,0.0007265719,0.0005245298,0.0004763124,0.0003882197,0.0001887364,0.0007427375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008618273,0.0002307869,0.0002264817,0.0005269181,0.0003474664,0.0002670555,0.0003788823,0.0002348678,0.0002565467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001134694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009460556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07588959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1712505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999249,0.000007692523,0.000003915767,0.00002466947,0.00002561681,0.00001312339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996976,0.00005131113,0.00005435053,0.00005358869,0.0000991146,0.00004410811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021258,0.00004385942,0.7557495,0.0001114087,0.0001040058,0.0002913236,0.001006661,0.02785294,0.1602819,0.002922488,0.0002672239,0.05116666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008560481,0.00003941842,0.9259413,0.00002290781,0.00002800539,0.0003108759,0.0004631289,0.05649715,0.01441494,0.0009320942,0.001323006,0.00001857557],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914415,0.00008635077,0.006771329,0.00001338917,0.000001335209,0.000006058811,0.0003682152,0.00005164813,0.001260116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937546,0.0000416768,0.005633211,0.00000372262,7.524774e-7,0.00000451239,0.0003586406,0.00001470492,0.0001882914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07588959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1508957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01809501245337831,"score_gpt":0.2534293197759166,"score_spread":0.2353343073225383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}