{"id":"W4251649490","doi":"10.1017/s0094837300018108","title":"Reconstruction of Tertiary <i>Metasequoia</i> forests. I. Test of a method for biomass determination based on stem dimensions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paleobiology","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Chamaecyparis; Canopy; Environmental science; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Forestry; Geography; Geology; Biology; Paleontology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002394405,0.0001042994,0.0002533846,0.0001116438,0.00003049037,0.000001219812,0.00004356594,0.00008590385,0.000005239564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002088289,0.0000905976,0.00008790342,0.0001029504,0.00006521357,0.00002249507,0.000005275701,0.00004097252,8.160699e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000178646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001129453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000393213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006624942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999337,0.00007396867,0.0002818334,0.0001351791,0.00003485549,0.0001371968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986542,0.00103447,0.00006677632,0.0001599815,0.00006382028,0.00002067731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004388148,0.0001254038,0.7237718,0.0004847171,0.00007991239,7.654513e-7,0.0001112576,0.001345093,0.2165464,0.0004389169,0.00009892114,0.05695293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001738827,0.000913623,0.1993127,0.00009980232,0.0001501497,0.00002039638,0.0001317164,0.08212177,0.7124706,0.00167011,0.00102676,0.0003434984],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8660403,0.0003585596,0.1318222,0.00004334465,0.0004751747,0.0004502824,0.0002025537,0.00007631251,0.0005313347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816068,0.000004018937,0.01829128,0.000005954138,0.00000899464,0.00005695684,0.00001190095,0.000009623702,0.000004495231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.524459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3694463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01809501245337831,"score_gpt":0.2534293197759166,"score_spread":0.2353343073225383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}