{"id":"W4251683102","doi":"10.1109/dac.2006.229439","title":"Early outpoint insertion for high-level software vs. RTL formal combinational equivalence verification","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings - ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Formal equivalence checking; Equivalence (formal languages); Formal verification; High-level synthesis; Combinational logic; Software; Theoretical computer science; Model checking; Parallel computing; Algorithm; Programming language; Embedded system; Mathematics; Field-programmable gate array; Logic gate; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002674065,0.0008788451,0.0005958856,0.001192446,0.0006305026,0.001403999,0.00154908,0.001005782,0.003612642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123457,0.0007081743,0.001098717,0.0005337608,0.002013366,0.003009366,0.002490982,0.00208816,0.0006832171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001202311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001196812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009804766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001422493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961284,0.001192836,0.0001780984,0.0004170393,0.001707789,0.0003757001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908166,0.006100844,0.0004285714,0.001841144,0.0007168558,0.00009611376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001032673,0.0003122396,0.00356522,0.0004959161,0.00008650399,0.001030338,0.001116465,0.1194026,0.1041706,0.4273777,0.002392321,0.3390175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001469695,0.0003576243,0.0005513786,0.0001225137,0.00009333888,0.0003978311,0.000110046,0.5082012,0.2434764,0.2339083,0.01255201,0.00008228985],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01823816,0.000043084,0.9776261,0.00007743709,0.00002368704,0.00006737547,0.00003283806,0.002124117,0.001767206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5097597,0.0001155166,0.4864669,0.0001666715,0.00002222511,0.0001995761,0.0001621243,0.0007607625,0.002346553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003612642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01414192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0981762457468505,"score_gpt":0.2938394154449512,"score_spread":0.1956631696981007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}