{"id":"W4251986301","doi":"10.5351/kjas.2002.15.2.281","title":"Statistical consideration of assessing bioequivalence in the new KFDA regulation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioequivalence; Medicine; Confidence interval; Guideline; Equivalence (formal languages); Medical prescription; Food and drug administration; Statistics; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Pharmacology; Mathematics; Pharmacokinetics; Internal medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3669684,0.001181705,0.003841392,0.004181585,0.001919572,0.007214967,0.004318225,0.005974242,0.001687982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5242078,0.001163297,0.004765635,0.005360031,0.01151409,0.004989768,0.004665021,0.01173033,0.0007772408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005152266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008045638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00447683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002445374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3903226,0.4719968,0.03102739,0.02321487,0.08095723,0.002481072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3460649,0.5182674,0.02564146,0.06170416,0.04683955,0.001482494],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002855567,0.0004946494,0.03299174,0.003036643,0.004462407,0.0009359086,0.002478738,0.02823123,0.004339777,0.5798316,0.05601006,0.2843317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008747762,0.004505216,0.0586243,0.002728218,0.003081971,0.001621295,0.001036567,0.1663002,0.009193058,0.5076231,0.2437011,0.0007101999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01983924,0.01044058,0.9213039,0.01961733,0.005643729,0.001138004,0.001338118,0.0008027768,0.0198763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.417355,0.002265193,0.5376371,0.02496252,0.005181044,0.005966056,0.001619154,0.00062606,0.004387882],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3669684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7806407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4802062970807835,"score_gpt":0.5125779966137606,"score_spread":0.03237169953297708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}