{"id":"W4252528083","doi":"10.5194/cp-2016-5-rc2","title":"Review - Streamflow variability over 1881-2011 period in northern Quebec: comparison of hydrological reconstructions based on tree rings and on geopotential height field reanalysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Streamflow; Geopotential height; Period (music); Geology; Climatology; Geopotential; Field (mathematics); Dendrochronology; Physical geography; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Meteorology; Cartography; Drainage basin; Precipitation; Mathematics; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008968948,0.0003741293,0.0006673581,0.00350348,0.0003934319,0.001092683,0.0007191504,0.0004124553,0.002512962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003076153,0.0001649622,0.0007041888,0.008902094,0.0002812237,0.0004397138,0.000219828,0.0002350269,0.0002422511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008088805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02192854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8997715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9555871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996204,0.00003552108,0.00007371391,0.00007936598,0.0001434033,0.00004757581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971102,0.0005176906,0.0004720658,0.00006645847,0.001721085,0.0001126364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006778694,0.00006329911,0.2527899,0.06328759,0.004926887,0.0007516422,0.001354784,0.001836037,0.001716097,0.0007319297,0.1038002,0.5680638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004563887,0.00006521046,0.7662582,0.01391152,0.003210072,0.0004036351,0.0006448295,0.0003178733,0.0005268447,0.00007793641,0.2144853,0.00005294782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.08847848,0.8686846,0.0003690805,0.001967213,0.0005800507,0.0001230667,0.0340983,0.00006898958,0.005630288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3518378,0.6196785,0.001015253,0.001151496,0.0005032631,0.0001067422,0.0207183,0.00003533125,0.004953315],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1002285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2016376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01482736468011423,"score_gpt":0.2648418668779301,"score_spread":0.2500145021978158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}