{"id":"W4252703108","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14639697","title":"Analyzing the Usability of an Argumentation Map as a Participatory Spatial Decision Support Tool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Usability; Learnability; Computer science; Interactivity; Human–computer interaction; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Usability engineering; Decision support system; Operationalization; Data science; Knowledge management; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01844988,0.0007948622,0.0005266301,0.002214281,0.001184363,0.003819968,0.001242222,0.001314542,0.001489414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08821955,0.0004235459,0.0005350479,0.001788435,0.001148961,0.002799814,0.002060592,0.00062694,0.0003135327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000754475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009098445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001993665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001808267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804928,0.01488008,0.0009072451,0.0007368444,0.002487413,0.000495645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8486627,0.1379212,0.002118109,0.004366429,0.006019681,0.0009118675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006037568,0.004001852,0.1440626,0.006072897,0.0005945242,0.004015996,0.2828484,0.02023243,0.06790633,0.006969547,0.004122949,0.453135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001734486,0.02900692,0.4093727,0.001899982,0.001460752,0.003851921,0.2098538,0.1944208,0.07396514,0.01306986,0.06037746,0.0009861698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863549,0.00006117072,0.01082054,0.00008698997,0.0000144753,0.0002643537,0.00007253584,0.0001870894,0.002137997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796802,0.00005390921,0.01925678,0.00002016414,0.000008774256,0.0002579425,0.0001571497,0.00006196438,0.0005031328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01844988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0975734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05464046337900512,"score_gpt":0.374925265557712,"score_spread":0.3202848021787069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}