{"id":"W4252967254","doi":"10.1016/s0169-5150(01)00078-0","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Econometrics; Strengths and weaknesses; Economics; Index (typography); Environmental economics; Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045803,0.001246541,0.001060493,0.006393935,0.000614366,0.002679437,0.002457666,0.001438401,0.006711275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05532329,0.0003858314,0.001777698,0.006814999,0.001424282,0.003282611,0.002548281,0.002141926,0.001309262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001777589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001806138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004124693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002939766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915681,0.004616251,0.0003947334,0.0008948059,0.002236992,0.0002891016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820492,0.01255248,0.001123112,0.002057684,0.00209573,0.0001217122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009919595,0.0001473454,0.006482751,0.0003062169,0.0003174819,0.00008969115,0.0002886664,0.2446544,0.0008513913,0.3831172,0.003455848,0.3601898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003304072,0.00005276646,0.003803018,0.00008315813,0.00004642514,0.0001141377,0.0001636173,0.6120037,0.0008548256,0.3652857,0.01748808,0.00007149344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002389909,0.0002154722,0.9949239,0.00008179774,0.00004739285,0.00004831022,0.0001689101,0.0001807551,0.001943602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1495748,0.0007599181,0.8424192,0.0001231705,0.000176956,0.0007676383,0.000947505,0.0003112056,0.004919645],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01045803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05530804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01591103475152748,"score_gpt":0.2773551700374889,"score_spread":0.2614441352859614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}