{"id":"W4253048755","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27409","title":"Scientific shortcomings in environmental impact statements internationally","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Rigour; Risk analysis (engineering); Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Management science; Environmental planning; Public economics; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Geography; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006288217,0.0004913101,0.0003727531,0.0001513534,0.0001871386,0.000340117,0.0008722208,0.0002679154,0.03749114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001597083,0.0004454917,0.0002376423,0.0001456122,0.0008072069,0.0006833042,0.003640894,0.0005289397,0.003036933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003346008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004414593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001582773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006483332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964842,0.0001050686,0.0006191285,0.001013573,0.001131991,0.0006460519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989078,0.00002765667,0.0002563114,0.0005486416,0.000003095574,0.0002564881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002523316,0.0005643544,0.9854752,0.000007780209,0.00005972641,0.00002134325,0.0008907861,0.0009048657,0.004167833,0.000007033212,0.005675602,0.00220022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004907661,0.00009633278,0.9902272,0.00004965314,0.00002074039,0.000003081829,0.000139461,0.001588323,0.0007306298,0.004120648,0.001933215,0.0005999275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780163,0.00002030225,0.0001603101,0.00008256823,0.0008698074,0.0006248326,0.0002033114,0.00004390168,0.01997865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903077,0.00003719123,0.001033617,0.0001913268,0.00008770626,0.00006274279,0.0004950398,0.00004670921,0.007737988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0344542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02189828211131946,"score_gpt":0.3504832130942355,"score_spread":0.328584930982916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}