{"id":"W4253596925","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14639964.v1","title":"Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Nordisk Ministerråd","keywords":"Observational study; Workload; Usability; Reliability (semiconductor); Sorting; Computer science; Work (physics); The Internet; Observational methods in psychology; Reliability engineering; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Medicine; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction; Algorithm; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0209588,0.0003326324,0.001224642,0.0002266299,0.0005443841,0.00003208599,0.0003547112,0.001066221,0.003200289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006028906,0.0002780296,0.0002728237,0.0005197334,0.00005293226,0.0001432898,0.001009302,0.001110811,0.0000629687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001194548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004607792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009995142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001023573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810486,0.01309738,0.002859283,0.0006132086,0.001902475,0.0004789839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847242,0.00927001,0.002011575,0.0008157807,0.002982154,0.0001962663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006410201,0.0008865572,0.3247482,0.6020474,0.00171409,0.000007431445,0.01013183,0.01027656,0.001584094,0.01982154,0.01675693,0.01138435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00403168,0.0001406681,0.5428284,0.2591675,0.003361165,0.000007862862,0.02130397,0.1284876,0.001099724,0.0370654,0.0004123808,0.002093668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8338731,0.00982476,0.1145904,0.003606194,0.01232951,0.009502147,0.00009893731,0.0002630335,0.01591192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7106165,0.0001227828,0.2797543,0.00105556,0.0006853609,0.002416541,0.001721621,0.00006641392,0.00356093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.34288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4749776746062643,"score_gpt":0.6123808384062187,"score_spread":0.1374031637999544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}