{"id":"W4253717432","doi":"10.1139/f01-131","title":"Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capturerecapture estimates of abundance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Abundance estimation; Statistics; Estimator; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Abundance (ecology); Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Mathematics; Population; Psychology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01332069,0.000592721,0.0004720931,0.001446963,0.0002909021,0.0005298046,0.0005650513,0.0006522454,0.001034079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07413086,0.0003729037,0.0006008779,0.0007704382,0.0008717219,0.00101835,0.00117071,0.000700098,0.0004622882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004527226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002213461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002569802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004316161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875138,0.005843562,0.001271204,0.002075435,0.002856173,0.0004398969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8089527,0.1490749,0.01877373,0.01436688,0.008126021,0.0007056581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002705379,0.0003238325,0.8817452,0.0002771785,0.000471033,0.0003057793,0.001736807,0.00505464,0.01625084,0.0003240132,0.000495527,0.09030983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001259754,0.0004767646,0.9813399,0.0000459242,0.000168421,0.0006413496,0.0001811914,0.005043872,0.01122906,0.0002898944,0.0005309318,0.000040133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804006,0.0009166796,0.01637382,0.00009103161,0.00003850428,0.00008067553,0.0003269401,0.0001083982,0.001663483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903779,0.0002867751,0.00733935,0.00005240999,0.00002071819,0.00006513155,0.0004473688,0.0001103329,0.001300045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01332069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07044733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01647483599548993,"score_gpt":0.2340362907458338,"score_spread":0.2175614547503438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}