{"id":"W4253863679","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016.0001","title":"Decomposing <i>Bhasin v Hrynew</i>  : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Faith; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Subject (documents); Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044963,0.00004986731,0.0001252236,0.00001280452,0.002028376,0.00004043622,0.0005893134,0.000048413,0.00008572099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000273086,0.00004566135,0.00005661917,0.00002701426,0.0006046797,0.0009672933,0.0001074227,0.0001169138,1.857825e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000375947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06913392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2207778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.00006270772,0.000147996,0.00007453734,0.0002625763,0.0001313507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992916,0.0000183631,0.0003663914,0.0001515329,0.000106742,0.00006538419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004877407,0.0001258509,0.04862637,0.00001210236,0.00002592894,0.000002358225,0.01094168,0.0004743727,0.003245969,0.9355513,0.000009199901,0.0009360964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003299773,0.0001955692,0.8870075,0.0004135186,0.00009682402,0.00002536844,0.04165563,0.002111877,0.004583792,0.002825545,0.05742202,0.0003625441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.924033,0.00003268065,0.0008522515,0.0003499507,0.00009683834,0.00007432887,0.00001053044,0.000003211654,0.07454719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984435,0.00008182546,0.001318973,0.000009554907,0.00006122074,2.436698e-8,5.136679e-7,0.000002356094,0.00008198366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04354523155426537,"score_gpt":0.2984003652038038,"score_spread":0.2548551336495384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}