{"id":"W4254039495","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.81","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE MARGINS: LAW, POWER, AND PREROGATIVE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004115695,0.00005023653,0.0001193616,0.000003218866,0.00292885,0.00001473737,0.0001806105,0.00003702358,0.002066693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004511051,0.00003969837,0.00006690548,0.00002021694,0.001979349,0.0002604425,0.00009966474,0.0001328191,0.000008362402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001083419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007070608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2090412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8545989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994052,0.00008778738,0.00007075698,0.00007145524,0.0002431255,0.0001216768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995562,0.00006484475,0.000101585,0.00005050783,0.000147278,0.00007954369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002266229,0.00001795711,0.0003857107,0.00000509898,0.0000472197,0.000008385931,0.004999433,8.132039e-8,0.00003614633,0.987698,0.005631368,0.001147942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001850233,0.00003150891,0.004097884,0.0001078573,0.000057205,0.00001066822,0.006873275,1.465502e-7,0.000005445652,0.006073381,0.9824937,0.00006392185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02448615,0.02038779,0.00001069063,0.007493951,0.0004179258,0.0001364324,0.00001271877,0.000009347335,0.947045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736192,0.02482199,0.0001037805,0.0006106439,0.0001899025,7.319071e-8,4.253855e-7,0.0000016283,0.000652345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01102937717594754,"score_gpt":0.2473415289119836,"score_spread":0.2363121517360361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}