{"id":"W4254610954","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-5859-2_14","title":"Health risk assessment for nanoparticles: A case for using expert judgment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Exposure assessment; Business; Medicine; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0288412,0.0008588678,0.00113434,0.002036556,0.002662861,0.007433311,0.003031133,0.006154094,0.004530266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04145778,0.0003079623,0.0009255841,0.0009313328,0.007418738,0.005409727,0.003358418,0.00611299,0.0006981016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003175638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003852923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005996849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009992207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853783,0.008756795,0.0005484565,0.0008862991,0.003834017,0.0005961799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520374,0.04159724,0.0005587672,0.001599594,0.003748832,0.0004582172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008750534,0.0001785965,0.001339806,0.0003608155,0.0001023188,0.001477825,0.007281785,0.009129256,0.001153618,0.793372,0.04090923,0.1446072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001879884,0.00004279279,0.0004239665,0.0004938604,0.00003136411,0.0004751942,0.002089,0.01022622,0.0008827432,0.9182296,0.06703887,0.00004757047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02905756,0.01172936,0.3566284,0.1097159,0.001854019,0.0003566101,0.000162067,0.0002189533,0.4902771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.616044,0.004759987,0.3085047,0.01731411,0.001198924,0.0002752231,0.0001206007,0.0002468181,0.05153564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0288412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1525286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2059104252396708,"score_gpt":0.4329164642863064,"score_spread":0.2270060390466356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}