{"id":"W4255268821","doi":"10.2196/preprints.9102","title":"Influence of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields on the Fertility System: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Cochrane Library; Fertility; Preprint; MEDLINE; Medicine; Observational study; Web of science; Mobile phone; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Protocol (science); Computer science; Alternative medicine; World Wide Web; Population; Telecommunications; Psychological intervention; Pathology; Environmental health; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05210273,0.005091427,0.01840763,0.008592461,0.002497424,0.005797861,0.003726896,0.005124118,0.06329926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08685954,0.004140744,0.02147183,0.008289627,0.002678879,0.005473413,0.003254385,0.004636997,0.005362787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01057451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03304855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004628804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009250857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9720085,0.0118335,0.009662692,0.002078046,0.003315424,0.001101812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635134,0.01456679,0.009017079,0.003330492,0.008545581,0.001026714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008302628,0.0001873669,0.0006187162,0.9337105,0.01025661,0.0003356614,0.0005185835,0.0007643944,0.001043929,0.002148558,0.01911843,0.02299465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05602763,0.003920425,0.01039761,0.6389877,0.06584,0.0005914876,0.00129237,0.001953285,0.003279945,0.01164613,0.2054174,0.0006460024],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006442492,0.006378155,0.002148882,0.0004829064,0.0006619745,0.984076,0.004880057,0.0001683167,0.0005595206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007497537,0.001888303,0.002455391,0.0002823607,0.0000477356,0.9937879,0.0004739803,0.00001233366,0.0003021103],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06329926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2755489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07709976298666797,"score_gpt":0.3771610632199237,"score_spread":0.3000613002332557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}