{"id":"W4255413586","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-45193-8_41","title":"An Efficient Bounds Consistency Algorithm for the Global Cardinality Constraint","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Kent","keywords":"Cardinality (data modeling); Consistency (knowledge bases); Local consistency; Constraint (computer-aided design); Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Constraint satisfaction; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001284722,0.0004575094,0.0004278838,0.0002084175,0.0007038479,0.0008932867,0.00188569,0.0002593273,0.00002709968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000894082,0.0003595975,0.0002155762,0.0005065794,0.00163183,0.0002767653,0.0002749666,0.0004178211,0.000007494265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001009244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002879913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008122605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966813,0.00006527706,0.0005297728,0.001339688,0.0007986349,0.0005852846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971407,0.000517986,0.0002779667,0.001375965,0.0004811116,0.0002062451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001849899,0.00002127671,0.00004168913,0.00000832307,0.00001481361,0.000009991379,0.0001396082,0.0938897,0.000002412974,0.06781745,0.00001568283,0.8380372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003150382,0.0001241762,0.0002149937,0.00005670252,0.00001996906,0.0001762411,9.598488e-7,0.9519919,0.00004314381,0.04406827,0.00253856,0.0004500673],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007557873,0.0003899926,0.992097,0.001082563,0.003062851,0.0008289727,0.00005498708,0.0001414184,0.002334651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05350469,0.00003043573,0.9430206,0.003015127,0.0002879274,0.00003137831,0.00001176787,0.000021495,0.00007658751],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01637634928976556,"score_gpt":0.263311045854145,"score_spread":0.2469346965643794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}