{"id":"W4255464247","doi":"10.1332/251569209x15664518847303","title":"Testing the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ Hypothesis in Constitutional Choice: A «Walk-Talk» Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Test (biology); Power (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Veil of ignorance; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03656502,0.0006262932,0.001527148,0.004407236,0.004915135,0.008041916,0.002696297,0.005296217,0.00865197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1201492,0.0008994833,0.001804675,0.003113043,0.03070763,0.01656743,0.007449141,0.006153018,0.0005954323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002907909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002178361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001391728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008247771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9429176,0.04545981,0.0008746859,0.00301822,0.00631687,0.001412779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7701098,0.2129923,0.006097042,0.006681461,0.003069428,0.001050015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001574145,0.00011701,0.002257946,0.0001045786,0.00008850781,0.0002397175,0.01216829,0.001998112,0.0004883733,0.9717922,0.0004494824,0.01013846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008188069,0.0001488885,0.001484108,0.00007598408,0.00004226804,0.00008934092,0.006810162,0.01092756,0.0008707104,0.977253,0.002168821,0.00004731571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3771017,0.0004830708,0.5382781,0.01373579,0.0001646765,0.0005733681,0.0002900815,0.0001344446,0.06923866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974977,0.00007713274,0.02263981,0.0004598764,0.00006658091,0.0005389702,0.00006139433,0.00002348276,0.0011557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03656502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1933766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08404966784928031,"score_gpt":0.2902641150848055,"score_spread":0.2062144472355252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}