{"id":"W4255464247","doi":"10.1332/251569209x15664518847303","title":"Testing the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ Hypothesis in Constitutional Choice: A «Walk-Talk» Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Test (biology); Power (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Veil of ignorance; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872209,0.0001273857,0.0003313749,0.0001872262,0.0006586001,0.0001508445,0.0004217231,0.00009083006,0.00001970191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00536276,0.00008990749,0.00009777751,0.001211745,0.001754682,0.0009032447,0.00003898728,0.0003096419,0.000001160496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009694673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001158646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001639849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009835955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981659,0.0001446817,0.0005400573,0.0001586979,0.0006123443,0.000378313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975761,0.00104123,0.0005288562,0.0000987534,0.0006573753,0.00009766826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555485,0.0004368492,0.1771691,0.00001285665,0.00005396371,0.000008771911,0.001178244,0.00003906033,0.0001103656,0.7082235,0.001507321,0.1112444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008121763,0.000110309,0.7416702,0.0000960973,0.00002145164,0.00004973447,0.002525079,0.00004202523,0.000005535283,0.02772484,0.2267635,0.0001790982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8351098,0.008447753,0.0005292532,0.0399643,0.0003764718,0.0002580332,0.00001536029,0.00001955056,0.1152795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975522,0.0005660821,0.0006124831,0.0005324912,0.0006563019,0.000005657839,6.345387e-7,0.000002507241,0.00007162763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6804987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6465197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08404966784928031,"score_gpt":0.2902641150848055,"score_spread":0.2062144472355252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}