{"id":"W4255710609","doi":"10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02389.x","title":"Effects of resource availability and heterogeneity on the slope of the species‐area curve along a floodplain‐upland gradient","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Floodplain; Spatial heterogeneity; Dominance (genetics); Ecology; Environmental science; Elevation (ballistics); Gradient analysis; Flooding (psychology); Environmental gradient; Soil science; Biology; Habitat; Ecological succession; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002015578,0.00007724373,0.0001504075,0.00005044198,0.000335625,0.00001532825,0.0003619231,0.00002550047,0.00001828979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008175896,0.00004069467,0.00006183364,0.0003740511,0.001620749,0.0002325931,0.0001310865,0.0001395818,0.000003965499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000886316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003217594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006656148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002748395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986682,0.0001631571,0.0003726655,0.0001414281,0.0005242077,0.0001303326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985158,0.0006742678,0.0005303568,0.000159981,0.00007102784,0.00004858062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006521068,0.0002532732,0.9210509,0.00004779478,0.00003069108,0.000002258272,0.005444676,0.02231477,0.04719237,0.001056032,0.0001625425,0.002379485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002322851,0.0001455077,0.9646971,0.00004186251,0.00001763231,0.00001548234,0.00009719258,0.002617962,0.0316372,0.0002988918,0.0001573836,0.0000414905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969991,0.0001388067,0.0001855579,0.00103101,0.0001027522,0.0001553352,0.000001012778,0.00000162212,0.001384767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.00003362049,0.0002979256,0.0002019981,0.00001401757,0.000001841943,5.387786e-8,0.000002046744,0.00004134849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04364621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5971717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01228960844561936,"score_gpt":0.2319878181121732,"score_spread":0.2196982096665539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}