{"id":"W4255794442","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27409v1","title":"Scientific shortcomings in environmental impact statements internationally","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Rigour; Risk analysis (engineering); Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3327968,0.001392759,0.001633929,0.01520895,0.006622124,0.0337965,0.006292143,0.00971368,0.01375133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5719261,0.001493228,0.00167524,0.01997392,0.02424453,0.02968747,0.01626453,0.01695507,0.003866402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008888629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02272543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004623927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00323726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6914023,0.1281262,0.02550941,0.01626705,0.1334811,0.005214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4060308,0.3654927,0.03090817,0.04595312,0.1478313,0.003783901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007226598,0.00005961481,0.004220439,0.0007762518,0.0001077053,0.0002611599,0.006651581,0.002864248,0.0003114352,0.7795373,0.07311961,0.1320184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003748503,0.00005770103,0.003147088,0.003372154,0.00008177791,0.000281567,0.007055777,0.002599841,0.00114774,0.6063545,0.3757781,0.00008630766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0193301,0.01305958,0.117739,0.3922997,0.01334251,0.0005099644,0.001541674,0.00108499,0.4410924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6743599,0.01493826,0.1337008,0.1247302,0.01214116,0.001324762,0.002236395,0.002224407,0.03434417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6672032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8227803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02189828211131946,"score_gpt":0.3504832130942355,"score_spread":0.328584930982916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}