{"id":"W4255844023","doi":"10.1017/s0022112000008272","title":"Nonlinear effects in two-layer large-amplitude geostrophic dynamics. Part 2. The weak-beta case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Baroclinity; Amplitude; Instability; Nonlinear system; Geostrophic wind; Physics; Mechanics; Zonal flow (plasma); Eddy; Flow (mathematics); Linear stability; Classical mechanics; Statistical physics; Turbulence; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002685149,0.0007432147,0.0002419106,0.0003664955,0.0004748101,0.0009991038,0.0003689888,0.0007011791,0.001677749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093071,0.000239899,0.0007875789,0.0001699536,0.001011474,0.001178779,0.001462251,0.0006921201,0.0001913665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005755351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003741052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003892504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001630621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999092,0.0000308618,0.000004841406,0.00001111365,0.00001787877,0.00002608421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995735,0.0001338512,0.0001520055,0.00003188077,0.00003359473,0.00007509039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001767409,0.0001731947,0.01356755,0.0002972531,0.0001044217,0.00167315,0.0007186659,0.6237293,0.03411942,0.3146125,0.00178097,0.009046718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003499438,0.00008065254,0.003085672,0.00001924978,0.00001813394,0.0001219205,0.0001013355,0.9470533,0.001044244,0.04741075,0.001008826,0.00002092765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042263,0.002053778,0.05076486,0.002231961,0.0002216048,0.00008384205,0.0001209218,0.0001072857,0.04018944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942588,0.0004279253,0.001113634,0.00007735071,0.00006038609,0.00002389395,0.00002016479,0.00001576549,0.004002096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003892504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007739723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007740352370476837,"score_gpt":0.2224776696305379,"score_spread":0.214737317260061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}