{"id":"W4256002947","doi":"10.1139/x99-210","title":"A compatible growth and yield model for the management of mixed tropical rain forest","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Yield (engineering); Sustainable forest management; Forest product; Forest inventory; Investment (military); Product (mathematics); Environmental science; Sustainable management; Mathematics; Environmental resource management; Statistics; Forestry; Agroforestry; Sustainability; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001650867,0.0009834353,0.000752256,0.0005693611,0.0006443024,0.001381573,0.002459375,0.001949777,0.005157489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00261275,0.0006166765,0.0008463358,0.0006785978,0.0008261234,0.001335509,0.0009287171,0.001566404,0.0008767048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00202093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03319355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02188392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996443,0.00009385611,0.00002042435,0.00008577795,0.00007657969,0.00007912581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995635,0.00018717,0.00007073676,0.00001707652,0.0001103419,0.00005111008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002687701,0.00002499779,0.000856131,0.00001922892,0.00001044863,0.0000713615,0.00004071434,0.9770451,0.0003226218,0.01859023,0.0005411033,0.002451258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008313669,0.000012535,0.0002541814,0.000002970865,0.000005027366,0.00001209243,0.000009105406,0.9953232,0.00003585678,0.003818002,0.0005121208,0.000006483634],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1694699,0.0008881958,0.79687,0.001300209,0.000206277,0.0002962615,0.002421083,0.0006049174,0.02794314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328899,0.0006471556,0.03562892,0.0001595409,0.0001065335,0.0007574903,0.001117041,0.0001472532,0.02854619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03319355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0660007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0446542717561426,"score_gpt":0.2809459844555635,"score_spread":0.2362917126994209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}