{"id":"W4256316986","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-08873","title":"Seeing and knowing in detective fiction : the case of Chinatown","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Chinatown; Art; Art history; Humanities; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001605347,0.0002729703,0.0003288011,0.001048974,0.02451646,0.006704581,0.001572663,0.004753679,0.01300799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003905304,0.0002639068,0.0002882775,0.001454969,0.02195172,0.004937215,0.004732835,0.006065488,0.0004443935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01577479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008659282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2785121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4480844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988658,0.000358,0.00002103058,0.0001446996,0.000142977,0.0004673999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972165,0.001752085,0.0001954154,0.0001803729,0.0001638761,0.0004916739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000336314,0.00004175046,0.004493416,0.0000486471,0.000007358958,0.005655837,0.8225238,0.0001797355,0.0003297149,0.1496163,0.004536299,0.01253349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002404656,0.00003713296,0.0106115,0.0001886305,0.00002862645,0.00203519,0.8008346,0.0008167638,0.0007411019,0.0235611,0.1610769,0.00004425708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7521564,0.0006115894,0.001042107,0.01760765,0.00006614047,0.00004424297,0.00004011033,0.00002324869,0.2284085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799451,0.0002209715,0.0002393945,0.0006320755,0.00001451146,0.000008032194,0.00001890572,0.0000104166,0.0189107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2785121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5537819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01074571155187046,"score_gpt":0.3025406807068232,"score_spread":0.2917949691549527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}