{"id":"W4256636836","doi":"10.1108/00197850810900048","title":"Performance evaluation in a matrix organization: a case study (Part Two)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Commercial Training","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada); Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Originality; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Process management; Matrix (chemical analysis); Knowledge management; Management science; Psychology; Business; Engineering; Process (computing); Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006823603,0.0004999395,0.000307687,0.001194731,0.004201081,0.003200256,0.001120774,0.002099121,0.002583443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01256086,0.0003040556,0.0004068404,0.0009846719,0.002331889,0.001581693,0.002164715,0.001602116,0.000440622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003520363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002086918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003153057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006806033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921708,0.0056015,0.000212808,0.0003639772,0.0009413905,0.0007096383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895064,0.005792895,0.001157961,0.0007284544,0.001305446,0.001508816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002159217,0.02049438,0.08925916,0.001451382,0.0001161059,0.06607366,0.3653196,0.01193343,0.01652734,0.03773697,0.01679371,0.3721352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004777464,0.02647617,0.1107258,0.001420157,0.0001253125,0.04483076,0.6093214,0.03538054,0.02734869,0.008697613,0.1347476,0.0004481483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803228,0.0002567511,0.008102357,0.001111438,0.00005344285,0.0007205664,0.000033597,0.00003293354,0.009366132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807458,0.0003216063,0.01337308,0.0001593127,0.00003274043,0.0003781993,0.00002600185,0.00002168417,0.004941611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006823603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0360871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5185269138112607,"score_gpt":0.4297298399891939,"score_spread":0.08879707382206681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}