{"id":"W4256636836","doi":"10.1108/00197850810900048","title":"Performance evaluation in a matrix organization: a case study (Part Two)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Commercial Training","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada); Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Originality; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Process management; Matrix (chemical analysis); Knowledge management; Management science; Psychology; Business; Engineering; Process (computing); Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003398334,0.0001231509,0.0002326541,0.0003778248,0.0005303085,0.0001298725,0.0001832461,0.00006564683,0.0006128768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006476268,0.0001060724,0.00002249609,0.001832088,0.00008507299,0.0005229225,0.0001035215,0.0002387503,0.00002796441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003413174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001831786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003028873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978462,0.0002939684,0.0005909794,0.0003179402,0.0007602287,0.0001906424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991601,0.0002233737,0.0001532974,0.000200245,0.0002034082,0.00005955137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002855154,0.00003655301,0.5287197,3.91303e-7,0.000005113512,0.00009209271,0.009423664,0.0001239794,0.000001074059,0.00001940624,0.0002028324,0.4613467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03403423,0.001448076,0.6407168,0.0001291185,0.000176815,0.00823375,0.212645,0.07065202,0.00004257905,0.0004622554,0.02998434,0.001474989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950745,0.0000149847,0.00001943406,0.0002190312,0.0007115488,0.0005339155,0.00000181505,0.00002902051,0.003395816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990311,0.000009903946,0.00004153361,0.0000549745,0.0005549911,0.00002477654,0.000002756792,0.000006866147,0.0002730769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4598717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6710572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5185269138112607,"score_gpt":0.4297298399891939,"score_spread":0.08879707382206681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}