{"id":"W4280583053","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.02.063","title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Contraceptive Subsidy in British Columbia, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Subsidy; Status quo; Unintended pregnancy; Pregnancy; Cost effectiveness; Family planning; Environmental health; Population; Research methodology; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589647,0.0005707064,0.001397785,0.001250697,0.00190292,0.002137066,0.001859727,0.001304002,0.00599876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01138237,0.000508715,0.00132762,0.002457988,0.00102382,0.0006228716,0.001180773,0.001843016,0.0002281758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1135667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1188536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997373,0.0006027474,0.0001672223,0.0001508974,0.0005515198,0.001154691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929239,0.001653653,0.0006710751,0.0001383606,0.002181169,0.002431884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04305322,0.005323908,0.6468353,0.003154387,0.002831195,0.001386998,0.001129766,0.03812893,0.0008724525,0.005146604,0.05995141,0.1921858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006129501,0.002727683,0.9519034,0.001164909,0.002687696,0.000286247,0.00385729,0.02146269,0.0004289175,0.0008767617,0.008291617,0.0001832753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966388,0.01096911,0.00009057255,0.005803784,0.0001864763,0.0003577255,0.00555544,0.00004228113,0.01060666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992442,0.002792533,0.0001428852,0.0005715216,0.00002215658,0.00006111481,0.0009007789,0.000008443369,0.003058474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1135667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8239881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01412126934908843,"score_gpt":0.2418672686881038,"score_spread":0.2277459993390154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}