{"id":"W4281698258","doi":"10.21428/cb6ab371.f6a2bb7c","title":"Take-home drug checking as a novel harm reduction strategy in British Columbia, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"CrimRxiv","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm reduction; Reduction (mathematics); Drug; Harm; History; Political science; Medicine; Law; Pharmacology; Public health; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005529343,0.0003470865,0.0009031842,0.0001827654,0.0002100572,0.0003149727,0.000466098,0.0002935218,0.002685735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002715611,0.0006470308,0.0001496451,0.0004780622,0.0001135142,0.00009988128,0.0006094622,0.002639001,0.00002184443],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002392342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006377033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961809,0.0001161653,0.0008330066,0.001222108,0.000944908,0.0007029439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981083,0.00006047612,0.0003371542,0.0009407573,0.000197894,0.0003553687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006219064,0.005220791,0.2019193,0.01203714,0.001757144,0.01885403,0.04044937,0.01249581,0.02297683,0.0002343193,0.5344059,0.1490275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009977567,0.0005250351,0.641235,0.004896137,0.001120018,0.003076522,0.2264706,0.001828603,0.001068155,0.002260787,0.1031345,0.004406997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828691,0.0009496736,0.00001109443,0.0007014903,0.002516719,0.001201454,0.0002538266,0.00016705,0.01132961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719026,0.0001962757,0.0001729518,0.000405996,0.000699985,0.0003346622,0.000664008,0.0001485546,0.02547496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4393157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06024177632748864,"score_gpt":0.3220535096519573,"score_spread":0.2618117333244687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}