{"id":"W4281701059","doi":"10.2495/ei-v5-n2-146-160","title":"Improving Quality of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Reports : A Statistical Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Impacts","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Psychology; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Evaluation methods; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2595168,0.000671648,0.001416932,0.01340993,0.001429278,0.005610077,0.001614878,0.0006226104,0.002381491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4765125,0.0005597915,0.002082223,0.01786325,0.00388587,0.005118741,0.003114733,0.001726689,0.000507268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003276441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005081363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002631247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003243878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.683978,0.1778154,0.04670707,0.007116455,0.0826301,0.001753085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2625172,0.5000432,0.06777591,0.05419928,0.1139786,0.001485859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001215709,0.0005346781,0.4846655,0.004716749,0.002209424,0.000203082,0.01602884,0.006115925,0.004892457,0.0229218,0.009887709,0.4466081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002837766,0.004349217,0.7039424,0.004655819,0.002053503,0.0005925445,0.04194316,0.05932154,0.02040962,0.08910565,0.07254986,0.000792922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4192452,0.002343168,0.5299756,0.007475364,0.000673275,0.00774715,0.009338548,0.001344253,0.02185751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369263,0.0005296583,0.1554155,0.0003540699,0.0001434345,0.003629406,0.002025478,0.0001470448,0.0008290225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2595168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9131476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01425548661902469,"score_gpt":0.3546775838029467,"score_spread":0.340422097183922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}