{"id":"W4281728608","doi":"10.3390/jcdd9060180","title":"Evaluation of the Appropriate Use of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Revascularization; Coronary artery disease; Retrospective cohort study; Pre- and post-test probability; Computed tomography angiography; Radiology; Cardiology; Single Center; Appropriate Use Criteria; Angina; Coronary angiography; Internal medicine; Angiography; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002137868,0.0002702294,0.0004744561,0.001310919,0.000434903,0.0007958031,0.0005191143,0.0005775481,0.0008717174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006404695,0.0003521911,0.0005264123,0.001618778,0.0004892115,0.0005754738,0.0005825381,0.0004775251,0.0001977752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004603663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005490512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003062269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003148826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976304,0.0006823862,0.0004891606,0.0004887494,0.0005273572,0.0001819732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901862,0.001922223,0.005330519,0.000804674,0.001099508,0.0006568193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003919505,0.00001036153,0.9995626,0.000005921971,0.00002731695,0.00003347891,0.00002584128,0.00001128841,0.00003584573,0.000003927855,0.00002267265,0.0002215459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006093404,0.0001105578,0.9987801,0.000009475933,0.0000471675,0.00050419,0.0001684961,0.0001744701,0.00006572259,0.000008680302,0.0001205414,0.000004586809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991387,0.000265079,0.0001170019,0.00001943057,0.000003723965,0.00001454863,0.0002543683,0.000002240062,0.0001848992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.00005611087,0.00007390554,0.000017338,0.000007448025,0.000009830363,0.000244942,0.000001388713,0.00001957981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003062269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01130629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02719303799924833,"score_gpt":0.2346783160743114,"score_spread":0.207485278075063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}