{"id":"W4281761274","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104028","title":"An Investigation Into Different Measurement Techniques to Assess Equine Proximal Hoof Circumference","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","topic":"Veterinary Equine Medical Research","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hoof; Repeatability; Circumference; Scanner; Calipers; Medicine; Context (archaeology); Photogrammetry; Orthodontics; Biomedical engineering; Anatomy; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Geometry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009989629,0.0004282838,0.0006403695,0.001978187,0.0009114814,0.0002949813,0.003576966,0.00006917621,0.000712062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001382374,0.0003646819,0.0001746014,0.002675467,0.0007373677,0.001952539,0.002458528,0.001137986,0.00001895548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002003195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005749508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000331716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894934,0.0008919631,0.001300744,0.0008313561,0.006432719,0.001049768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954949,0.0001382759,0.0006531143,0.0009684632,0.001380269,0.001364965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001377066,0.0006038535,0.001219826,0.00008694197,0.00002120629,0.001652451,0.001099934,0.00005332833,0.9808573,0.0001814605,0.0003971157,0.01244953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001569439,0.8956723,0.02055928,0.0005896729,0.00006180791,0.0180452,0.002002653,0.003727211,0.04591729,0.00236054,0.008223841,0.001270731],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908963,0.0001109837,0.004805481,0.002250788,0.0008473624,0.000697118,0.00001347917,0.0001087425,0.0002697781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874678,0.00001290469,0.01141444,0.0004372507,0.0004073466,0.0001368144,0.000005005137,0.00004913759,0.00006932254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.93494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3021348291452556,"score_gpt":0.4436314303705494,"score_spread":0.1414966012252938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}