{"id":"W4281770384","doi":"10.1007/s11019-022-10091-2","title":"How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Deliberation; Pragmatism; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of medicine; Sociology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01268943,0.00006676195,0.0002164366,0.00007498451,0.002123269,0.00003846347,0.0001060618,0.00006610358,0.00002485061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004356572,0.00004912759,0.00001309427,0.0004225454,0.0006252936,0.00006155296,0.00004295207,0.0003120367,1.35347e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001745317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002352905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002431369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002515536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913849,0.006530764,0.0002606273,0.0001986877,0.001390236,0.0002348399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967507,0.001530764,0.00008569325,0.0001232439,0.001282381,0.0002271863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001780448,0.00002494846,0.0002142227,0.0002112825,0.00001001203,2.745926e-7,0.6370611,6.232424e-7,0.00004668143,0.3338325,0.007824755,0.02059559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001857249,0.005325621,0.001314746,0.00006322531,0.00004043511,0.000001168542,0.4415064,0.0001460843,0.00002411566,0.4894778,0.06011507,0.0001280743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2835723,0.00183739,0.00004194463,0.7095901,0.0004635744,0.003281906,0.000147625,0.00001177091,0.001053319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912704,0.00006844618,0.0006284361,0.005990386,0.001243798,0.0007085851,0.00006747434,0.000007081775,0.00001534235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7076981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2123532205836543,"score_gpt":0.5734767407625652,"score_spread":0.3611235201789109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}