{"id":"W4281770384","doi":"10.1007/s11019-022-10091-2","title":"How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Deliberation; Pragmatism; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of medicine; Sociology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.6960356,0.004455398,0.0142157,0.02140768,0.02367028,0.05012526,0.0226426,0.05212069,0.005951631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7535657,0.003139124,0.009200393,0.01042265,0.1857556,0.06079431,0.02935876,0.0354972,0.001793721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03882896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09723807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01156511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009066819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2525429,0.5851243,0.05852361,0.01982717,0.07543916,0.008543058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1364283,0.6981621,0.0219725,0.03551304,0.09744783,0.01047615],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009691682,0.0001064203,0.0006640746,0.0009695062,0.0002402975,0.00009401826,0.006055569,0.0009545094,0.0001086954,0.9640329,0.01039726,0.01627979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001793443,0.00008755067,0.0003184791,0.001427588,0.0001176163,0.0001035329,0.002395364,0.002931074,0.0002397792,0.982233,0.009808961,0.0001576267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004846173,0.006273023,0.3602124,0.5942596,0.004632439,0.00369196,0.0002508503,0.0003554218,0.02547816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2387288,0.001308582,0.7069396,0.03677575,0.003170081,0.01037891,0.0001502514,0.0003226196,0.002225484],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6960356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3748422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2123532205836543,"score_gpt":0.5734767407625652,"score_spread":0.3611235201789109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}