{"id":"W4281849962","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115277","title":"A Global review of cumulative effects assessments of disturbances on forest ecosystems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Canadian Forest Service; Dalhousie University; University of Saskatchewan; Natural Resources Canada; Queen's University; Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Nexus (standard); Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Adaptive management; Cumulative effects; Disturbance (geology); Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008812834,0.001332632,0.002540339,0.01978004,0.00054815,0.002999913,0.001347525,0.001541319,0.008600187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03089899,0.0006576813,0.003278753,0.018137,0.0009612962,0.003257153,0.001731073,0.00136204,0.001361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002725616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008976384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005144353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01405487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936351,0.001822062,0.001969088,0.0005882605,0.001808916,0.0001766538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950906,0.03695593,0.004713655,0.0008976782,0.005934454,0.00059234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001315804,0.00003622677,0.001629821,0.3734348,0.001928631,0.0002297789,0.000626959,0.000765919,0.0007253,0.003337028,0.03329838,0.5838556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002611209,0.0001619225,0.01046084,0.4128632,0.005988425,0.0006646854,0.0006279272,0.0001637336,0.0004084992,0.004008639,0.5645609,0.00006495106],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004681677,0.9947108,0.0006357665,0.0009883104,0.0004710931,0.00003652781,0.0005632456,0.00002464369,0.00210154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004064597,0.99314,0.0008120515,0.0009268203,0.0003190741,0.00005196537,0.0003786739,0.00001709066,0.0002896815],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01978004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04660726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0222759451749486,"score_gpt":0.3241572359599046,"score_spread":0.3018812907849561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}