{"id":"W4281854563","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101945","title":"Community reentry and the revolving door problem: Are individuals convicted of sexual offenses adequately prepared?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recidivism; Criminal justice; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Reentry; Revolving door; Intervention (counseling); Poison control; Psychiatry; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001270017,0.0001837124,0.0003312736,0.0009713512,0.002037584,0.001764385,0.000856138,0.003202958,0.005430187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01650824,0.0002266822,0.0001950769,0.000562307,0.001409695,0.002272167,0.001233309,0.002514697,0.0005115955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002368165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005892479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01928746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989915,0.0003455764,0.00004777404,0.00006427469,0.0001347783,0.0004160099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951856,0.0008932592,0.001489921,0.0001605724,0.0004547415,0.001815973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003062648,0.00184773,0.874302,0.0001009421,0.00004558359,0.006978138,0.009461883,0.00009660764,0.0002997401,0.002500021,0.009154059,0.09490696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006459939,0.0005394531,0.8575025,0.0006248367,0.00006248101,0.01425894,0.1113074,0.0006371125,0.0002190676,0.005816927,0.008906053,0.00006079152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619138,0.001569175,0.0000909626,0.02007188,0.0001217878,0.0000347499,0.00003798444,0.00001218605,0.01614745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972411,0.0005899839,0.0000806469,0.001263903,0.00006212593,0.00001110535,0.00002448701,0.000004023555,0.000722554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005892479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01816583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04971733218697202,"score_gpt":0.3210684753606982,"score_spread":0.2713511431737262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}