{"id":"W4282968978","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2022.849246","title":"Assessing Ecological Recovery of Reclaimed Well Sites: A Case Study From Alberta, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Parks","keywords":"Land reclamation; Forb; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Boreal; Ecosystem; Native plant; Restoration ecology; Fire regime; Ecology; Introduced species; Geography; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Grassland; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009603698,0.0004499515,0.0002634015,0.001629199,0.003526499,0.001254861,0.001372183,0.0004687781,0.000706304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001404464,0.0002257491,0.0002244737,0.002842207,0.001182924,0.0003472129,0.0006491622,0.0004651814,0.00009057426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03260211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02487046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998937,0.00009317137,0.00003082579,0.00007756051,0.0005396474,0.0003218444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982702,0.0001624239,0.0001409127,0.00006667654,0.001084948,0.0002749071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005178642,0.0006240061,0.8494925,0.0002927077,0.0001124454,0.007445615,0.01875883,0.007341297,0.008271565,0.001136037,0.002709185,0.1032978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002405524,0.0002182499,0.948235,0.0000839339,0.00005866761,0.000671139,0.03694928,0.003636218,0.001822377,0.0001287489,0.008123656,0.00004869253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954692,0.0003522838,0.0003477313,0.0001230113,0.000003968569,0.00008738149,0.0003003864,0.00001570861,0.003300259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946849,0.000481197,0.001832385,0.00007585782,0.000003226872,0.0000209035,0.0004434142,0.000007300983,0.002450821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03260211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2365459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0290984346001631,"score_gpt":0.2397696821185558,"score_spread":0.2106712475183927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}